Central Window Cleaning
BRMC

Date Range

Markets

PPC Performance Summary — Pittsburgh

vs. 2026 ago: same 2026-01-312026-04-30 window prior year

Ad Spend

$2,242.32new

Total Leads

8new

Cost Per Lead

$280.29new

Spend ÷ (forms + calls)

Click → Lead

0.7%

Leads ÷ Clicks

Avg CPC

$2.06

Year to Date — Pittsburgh

Spend YTD

$2,242.32

Jan 1 → 2026-04-30

Leads YTD

8

Calls + form submissions

CPL YTD

$280.29

Spend ÷ leads · year to date

Lead Quality

Form Submissions

7new

Phone Calls

1new

Calls Answered (Ads+LSA)

90%

72/80 from CallRail

Avg Call Duration

1m 52s

CallRail (all channels)

Clicks

1,090

2.82% CTR

Recent Form Leads

DateNameServiceSource
2026-03-29Lynda Thompson"Window Cleaning, Power Washing"Google Ads - Pittsburgh
2026-03-29Noreen KarnashWindow CleaningGoogle Ads - Pittsburgh
2026-04-04Daniel Koko Tee FahnbullehWindow CleaningGoogle Ads - Pittsburgh
2026-04-07Gayle KallaugherWindow CleaningGoogle Ads - Pittsburgh
2026-04-09Jeanie FranciscusWindow CleaningGoogle Ads - Pittsburgh
2026-04-13Rhonda LucasWindow CleaningGoogle Ads - Pittsburgh
2026-04-15Daniel DozierWindow CleaningGoogle Ads - Pittsburgh

Recent Call Leads

DatePhoneDurationStatus
2026-04-20(434) 249-02891:36completed

Ad Spend Over Time

2026-01-31 → 2026-04-30

Cost Per Lead Over Time

Lower is better

Leads Over Time

Calls + form submissions

YoY Monthly Comparison

Last 6 months · this year vs prior year
Orange = current year · Black = prior year

Spend vs. Budget Pacing

Pittsburgh · daily budget from Google Ads

Daily

$20

Weekly

$140

Monthly

$600

Selected period · 2026-01-31 → 2026-04-30

Ahead of pace (overspending) · +25%
$2,242 actual$1,800 expected

Week to date

$0 actual$80 expected

Month to date

$1,816 actual$600 expected

Search Campaign Health

Search Impression Share

13.5%

% of available impressions captured

Lost IS — Budget

9.4%

Demand missed due to underspend

Lost IS — Rank

77.2%

Demand missed due to ad rank

Quality Score Distribution

Keywords by QS 1–10
Quality Score data not available.

Spend by Match Type

Broad / Phrase / Exact

CallRail Health — Live (Winsor)

Sheets remain the source of truth for CPL · CallRail powers call quality + LSA

Total Calls

306

Answered

90%

274/306

Missed / Abandoned

1%

4 calls

Voicemail

28

9% of calls

First-time Callers

63%

193 unique

LSA Calls

59

Google Guaranteed

Calls by Channel

From CallRail source_name

Year-to-Date & Trend — Pittsburgh

YTD: 2026-01-01 → today

YTD Spend

$2,242.32

YTD Leads

8

Calls + Forms

YTD CPL

$280.29

YTD Spend ÷ YTD Leads

6-Month CPL Trend

Bars = leads · Line = CPL

Call Volume Heatmap

Day-of-week × hour · CallRail (current view)
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Less
MoreTimes shown in UTC

Top Caller Cities

From CallRail customer location
CityStateCallsAnswered
PittsburghPA13484%
Newtown (Bucks Co.)PA18100%
WashingtonPA1275%
CarnegiePA683%
GreensburgPA5100%
GlenshawPA4100%
BostonMA475%
Tampa EastFL4100%
SyracuseNY4100%
AliquippaPA3100%
RichmondVA3100%
HuntsvilleAL3100%
McKeesportPA3100%
KittanningPA333%
SpringdalePA3100%

Lead Mix

Calls vs form submissions

Project Type

From form submissions

Campaign Summary — Pittsburgh

28 rows
CampaignClicksImpressionsCTRAvg CPCSpendSpend ShareAllocated CPL
Pittsburgh1,09038,6482.82%$2.06$2242.32100.0%$280.29