Date Range
Markets
Central Window Cleaning — Marketing Performance Scorecard
Pittsburgh · 2026-01-31 → 2026-04-30 · Generated by BRMC
PPC Performance Summary — Pittsburgh
vs. 2026 ago: same 2026-01-31 → 2026-04-30 window prior yearAd Spend
Total Leads
Cost Per Lead
Spend ÷ (forms + calls)
Click → Lead
Leads ÷ Clicks
Avg CPC
Year to Date — Pittsburgh
Spend YTD
Jan 1 → 2026-04-30
Leads YTD
Calls + form submissions
CPL YTD
Spend ÷ leads · year to date
Lead Quality
Form Submissions
Phone Calls
Calls Answered (Ads+LSA)
72/80 from CallRail
Avg Call Duration
CallRail (all channels)
Clicks
2.82% CTR
Recent Form Leads
| Date | Name | Service | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-29 | Lynda Thompson | "Window Cleaning, Power Washing" | Google Ads - Pittsburgh |
| 2026-03-29 | Noreen Karnash | Window Cleaning | Google Ads - Pittsburgh |
| 2026-04-04 | Daniel Koko Tee Fahnbulleh | Window Cleaning | Google Ads - Pittsburgh |
| 2026-04-07 | Gayle Kallaugher | Window Cleaning | Google Ads - Pittsburgh |
| 2026-04-09 | Jeanie Franciscus | Window Cleaning | Google Ads - Pittsburgh |
| 2026-04-13 | Rhonda Lucas | Window Cleaning | Google Ads - Pittsburgh |
| 2026-04-15 | Daniel Dozier | Window Cleaning | Google Ads - Pittsburgh |
Recent Call Leads
| Date | Phone | Duration | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-20 | (434) 249-0289 | 1:36 | completed |
Ad Spend Over Time
2026-01-31 → 2026-04-30Cost Per Lead Over Time
Lower is betterLeads Over Time
Calls + form submissionsYoY Monthly Comparison
Last 6 months · this year vs prior yearSpend vs. Budget Pacing
Pittsburgh · daily budget from Google AdsDaily
$20
Weekly
$140
Monthly
$600
Selected period · 2026-01-31 → 2026-04-30
Ahead of pace (overspending) · +25%Week to date
Month to date
Search Campaign Health
Search Impression Share
% of available impressions captured
Lost IS — Budget
Demand missed due to underspend
Lost IS — Rank
Demand missed due to ad rank
Quality Score Distribution
Keywords by QS 1–10Spend by Match Type
Broad / Phrase / ExactCallRail Health — Live (Winsor)
Sheets remain the source of truth for CPL · CallRail powers call quality + LSATotal Calls
Answered
274/306
Missed / Abandoned
4 calls
Voicemail
9% of calls
First-time Callers
193 unique
LSA Calls
Google Guaranteed
Calls by Channel
From CallRail source_nameYear-to-Date & Trend — Pittsburgh
YTD: 2026-01-01 → todayYTD Spend
YTD Leads
Calls + Forms
YTD CPL
YTD Spend ÷ YTD Leads
6-Month CPL Trend
Bars = leads · Line = CPLCall Volume Heatmap
Day-of-week × hour · CallRail (current view)Top Caller Cities
From CallRail customer location| City | State | Calls | Answered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pittsburgh | PA | 134 | 84% |
| Newtown (Bucks Co.) | PA | 18 | 100% |
| Washington | PA | 12 | 75% |
| Carnegie | PA | 6 | 83% |
| Greensburg | PA | 5 | 100% |
| Glenshaw | PA | 4 | 100% |
| Boston | MA | 4 | 75% |
| Tampa East | FL | 4 | 100% |
| Syracuse | NY | 4 | 100% |
| Aliquippa | PA | 3 | 100% |
| Richmond | VA | 3 | 100% |
| Huntsville | AL | 3 | 100% |
| McKeesport | PA | 3 | 100% |
| Kittanning | PA | 3 | 33% |
| Springdale | PA | 3 | 100% |
Lead Mix
Calls vs form submissionsProject Type
From form submissionsCampaign Summary — Pittsburgh
28 rows| Campaign | Clicks | Impressions | CTR | Avg CPC | Spend | Spend Share | Allocated CPL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pittsburgh | 1,090 | 38,648 | 2.82% | $2.06 | $2242.32 | 100.0% | $280.29 |

